This is the Math Investigation Task question assigned to your group. You may click on the question for a full screen view and then click back to the blog view to begin contributing your ideas and thoughts in the comment section below this post.
This question links back to our geometry unit where we constructed and measured angles. Strategies to tackle this question are angle measurement skills and following instructions.
Hi I’m going to give your group (group 3) some advice for one instead of just telling the answer try to tell how you got the answer like anyone can say 1+1=2 but say how you checked your work and what you thought. As well as checking spelling and punctuation you could've made it a lot better but I think it’s still great. And you could also have used schema=background knowledge (like troy and Jason said), world knowledge and personal knowledge. Anyways great job everyone! Ryan
This question links back to our geometry unit where we constructed and measured angles. Strategies to tackle this question are angle measurement skills and following instructions.
ReplyDeleteI REMEMBER TAKING GEOMETRY IN TERM 2 LEARNING HOW TO MAKE FIGURES WITH PROTACTOR AND RULER.JESSICA V
ReplyDeleteThis relates to the Math unit where we study angles and measurement. This Question requires us to contruct a polygon. Jason
ReplyDeletethis reminds me takin geometry using the protactor and make a parellogram this means has two parellogram sides , but how the sides change??JESSICA V
ReplyDeletethis learning reminds me from term 1 of geometry because measuring angles with a protacter and a ruler to measure the shape
ReplyDeleteThis also reminds me of when we had to construct a polygon as Jason said, and make your own figures and measure that too. Troy
ReplyDeleteHi I’m going to give your group (group 3) some advice for one instead of just telling the answer try to tell how you got the answer like anyone can say 1+1=2 but say how you checked your work and what you thought. As well as checking spelling and punctuation you could've made it a lot better but I think it’s still great. And you could also have used schema=background knowledge (like troy and Jason said), world knowledge and personal knowledge. Anyways great job everyone! Ryan
ReplyDelete